الفصل الفصل 73 · 第73章
. Ellen and he got on capitally, all the better, perhaps, because the
disparity between them was so great, that neither did Ellen want to be
elevated, nor did Ernest want to elevate her. He was very fond of her,
and very kind to her; they had interests which they could serve in
common; they had antecedents with a good part of which each was
familiar; they had each of them excellent tempers, and this was enough.
Ellen did not seem jealous at Ernest’s preferring to sit the greater
part of his time after the day’s work was done in the first floor front
where I occasionally visited him. She might have come and sat with him
if she had liked, but, somehow or other, she generally found enough to
occupy her down below. She had the tact also to encourage him to go out
of an evening whenever he had a mind, without in the least caring that
he should take her too—and this suited Ernest very well. He was, I
should say, much happier in his married life than people generally are.
At first it had been very painful to him to meet any of his old
friends, as he sometimes accidentally did, but this soon passed; either
they cut him, or he cut them; it was not nice being cut for the first
time or two, but after that, it became rather pleasant than not, and
when he began to see that he was going ahead, he cared very little what
people might say about his antecedents. The ordeal is a painful one,
but if a man’s moral and intellectual constitution are naturally sound,
there is nothing which will give him so much strength of character as
having been well cut.
It was easy for him to keep his expenditure down, for his tastes were
not luxurious. He liked theatres, outings into the country on a Sunday,
and tobacco, but he did not care for much else, except writing and
music. As for the usual run of concerts, he hated them. He worshipped
Handel; he liked Offenbach, and the airs that went about the streets,
but he cared for nothing between these two extremes. Music, therefore,
cost him little. As for theatres, I got him and Ellen as many orders as
they liked, so these cost them nothing. The Sunday outings were a small
item; for a shilling or two he could get a return ticket to some place
far enough out of town to give him a good walk and a thorough change
for the day. Ellen went with him the first few times, but she said she
found it too much for her, there were a few of her old friends whom she
should sometimes like to see, and they and he, she said, would not hit
it off perhaps too well, so it would be better for him to go alone.
This seemed so sensible, and suited Ernest so exactly that he readily
fell into it, nor did he suspect dangers which were apparent enough to
me when I heard how she had treated the matter. I kept silence,
however, and for a time all continued to go well. As I have said, one
of his chief pleasures was in writing. If a man carries with him a
little sketch book and is continually jotting down sketches, he has the
artistic instinct; a hundred things may hinder his due development, but
the instinct is there. The literary instinct may be known by a man’s
keeping a small note-book in his waistcoat pocket, into which he jots
down anything that strikes him, or any good thing that he hears said,
or a reference to any passage which he thinks will come in useful to
him. Ernest had such a note-book always with him. Even when he was at
Cambridge he had begun the practice without anyone’s having suggested
it to him. These notes he copied out from time to time into a book,
which as they accumulated, he was driven into indexing approximately,
as he went along. When I found out this, I knew that he had the
literary instinct, and when I saw his notes I began to hope great
things of him.
For a long time I was disappointed. He was kept back by the nature of
the subjects he chose—which were generally metaphysical. In vain I
tried to get him away from these to matters which had a greater
interest for the general public. When I begged him to try his hand at
some pretty, graceful, little story which should be full of whatever
people knew and liked best, he would immediately set to work upon a
treatise to show the grounds on which all belief rested.
“You are stirring mud,” said I, “or poking at a sleeping dog. You are
trying to make people resume consciousness about things, which, with
sensible men, have already passed into the unconscious stage. The men
whom you would disturb are in front of you, and not, as you fancy,
behind you; it is you who are the lagger, not they.”
He could not see it. He said he was engaged on an essay upon the famous
_quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus_ of St Vincent de Lerins.
This was the more provoking because he showed himself able to do better
things if he had liked.
I was then at work upon my burlesque “The Impatient Griselda,” and was
sometimes at my wits’ end for a piece of business or a situation; he
gave me many suggestions, all of which were marked by excellent good
sense. Nevertheless I could not prevail with him to put philosophy on
one side, and was obliged to leave him to himself.
For a long time, as I have said, his choice of subjects continued to be
such as I could not approve. He was continually studying scientific and
metaphysical writers, in the hope of either finding or making for
himself a philosopher’s stone in the shape of a system which should go
on all fours under all circumstances, instead of being liable to be
upset at every touch and turn, as every system yet promulgated has
turned out to be.
He kept to the pursuit of this will-o’-the-wisp so long that I gave up
hope, and set him down as another fly that had been caught, as it were,
by a piece of paper daubed over with some sticky stuff that had not
even the merit of being sweet, but to my surprise he at last declared
that he was satisfied, and had found what he wanted.
I supposed that he had only hit upon some new “Lo, here!” when to my
relief, he told me that he had concluded that no system which should go
perfectly upon all fours was possible, inasmuch as no one could get
behind Bishop Berkeley, and therefore no absolutely incontrovertible
first premise could ever be laid. Having found this he was just as well
pleased as if he had found the most perfect system imaginable. All he
wanted he said, was to know which way it was to be—that is to say
whether a system was possible or not, and if possible then what the
system was to be. Having found out that no system based on absolute
certainty was possible he was contented.
I had only a very vague idea who Bishop Berkeley was, but was thankful
to him for having defended us from an incontrovertible first premise. I
am afraid I said a few words implying that after a great deal of
trouble he had arrived at the conclusion which sensible people reach
without bothering their brains so much.
He said: “Yes, but I was not born sensible. A child of ordinary powers
learns to walk at a year or two old without knowing much about it;
failing ordinary powers he had better learn laboriously than never
learn at all. I am sorry I was not stronger, but to do as I did was my
only chance.”
He looked so meek that I was vexed with myself for having said what I
had, more especially when I remembered his bringing-up, which had
doubtless done much to impair his power of taking a common-sense view
of things. He continued—
“I see it all now. The people like Towneley are the only ones who know
anything that is worth knowing, and like that of course I can never be.
But to make Towneleys possible there must be hewers of wood and drawers
of water—men in fact through whom conscious knowledge must pass before
it can reach those who can apply it gracefully and instinctively as the
Towneleys can. I am a hewer of wood, but if I accept the position
frankly and do not set up to be a Towneley, it does not matter.”
He still, therefore, stuck to science instead of turning to literature
proper as I hoped he would have done, but he confined himself
henceforth to enquiries on specific subjects concerning which an
increase of our knowledge—as he said—was possible. Having in fact,
after infinite vexation of spirit, arrived at a conclusion which cut at
the roots of all knowledge, he settled contentedly down to the pursuit
of knowledge, and has pursued it ever since in spite of occasional
excursions into the regions of literature proper.
But this is anticipating, and may perhaps also convey a wrong
impression, for from the outset he did occasionally turn his attention
to work which must be more properly called literary than either
scientific or metaphysical.