الفصل الفصل 20 · And Carthage Was Destroyed
The little Phœnician trading post of Kart-hadshat stood on a low hill
which overlooked the African Sea, a stretch of water ninety miles
wide which separates Africa from Europe. It was an ideal spot for a
commercial centre. Almost too ideal. It grew too fast and became too
rich. When in the sixth century before our era, Nebuchadnezzar of
Babylon destroyed Tyre, Carthage broke off all further relations with
the Mother Country and became an independent state—the great western
advance-post of the Semitic races.
Unfortunately the city had inherited many of the traits which for a
thousand years had been characteristic of the Phœnicians. It was a vast
business-house, protected by a strong navy, indifferent to most of the
finer aspects of life. The city and the surrounding country and the
distant colonies were all ruled by a small but exceedingly powerful
group of rich men. The Greek word for rich is “ploutos” and the Greeks
called such a government by “rich men” a “Plutocracy.” Carthage was a
plutocracy and the real power of the state lay in the hands of a dozen
big ship-owners and mine-owners and merchants who met in the back
room of an office and regarded their common Fatherland as a business
enterprise which ought to yield them a decent profit. They were however
wide awake and full of energy and worked very hard.
[Illustration: CARTHAGE]
As the years went by the influence of Carthage upon her neighbours
increased until the greater part of the African coast, Spain and
certain regions of France were Carthaginian possessions, and paid
tribute, taxes and dividends to the mighty city on the African Sea.
Of course, such a “plutocracy” was forever at the mercy of the crowd.
As long as there was plenty of work and wages were high, the majority
of the citizens were quite contented, allowed their “betters” to rule
them and asked no embarrassing questions. But when no ships left the
harbor, when no ore was brought to the smelting-ovens, when dockworkers
and stevedores were thrown out of employment, then there were
grumblings and there was a demand that the popular assembly be called
together as in the olden days when Carthage had been a self-governing
republic.
[Illustration: SPHERES OF INFLUENCE]
To prevent such an occurrence the plutocracy was obliged to keep
the business of the town going at full speed. They had managed to
do this very successfully for almost five hundred years when they
were greatly disturbed by certain rumors which reached them from the
western coast of Italy. It was said that a little village on the banks
of the Tiber had suddenly risen to great power and was making itself
the acknowledged leader of all the Latin tribes who inhabited central
Italy. It was also said that this village, which by the way was called
Rome, intended to build ships and go after the commerce of Sicily and
the southern coast of France.
Carthage could not possibly tolerate such competition. The young rival
must be destroyed lest the Carthaginian rulers lose their prestige as
the absolute rulers of the western Mediterranean. The rumors were duly
investigated and in a general way these were the facts that came to
light.
The west coast of Italy had long been neglected by civilisation.
Whereas in Greece all the good harbours faced eastward and enjoyed a
full view of the busy islands of the Ægean, the west coast of Italy
contemplated nothing more exciting than the desolate waves of the
Mediterranean. The country was poor. It was therefore rarely visited by
foreign merchants and the natives were allowed to live in undisturbed
possession of their hills and their marshy plains.
The first serious invasion of this land came from the north. At an
unknown date certain Indo-European tribes had managed to find their
way through the passes of the Alps and had pushed southward until they
had filled the heel and the toe of the famous Italian boot with their
villages and their flocks. Of these early conquerors we know nothing.
No Homer sang their glory. Their own accounts of the foundation of Rome
(written eight hundred years later when the little city had become the
centre of an Empire) are fairy stories and do not belong in a history.
Romulus and Remus jumping across each other’s walls (I always forget
who jumped across whose wall) make entertaining reading, but the
foundation of the City of Rome was a much more prosaic affair. Rome
began as a thousand American cities have done, by being a convenient
place for barter and horse-trading. It lay in the heart of the plains
of central Italy. The Tiber provided direct access to the sea. The
land-road from north to south found here a convenient ford which could
be used all the year around. And seven little hills along the banks of
the river offered the inhabitants a safe shelter against their enemies
who lived in the mountains and those who lived beyond the horizon of
the nearby sea.
[Illustration: HOW THE CITY OF ROME HAPPENED]
The mountaineers were called the Sabines. They were a rough crowd
with an unholy desire for easy plunder. But they were very backward.
They used stone axes and wooden shields and were no match for the
Romans with their steel swords. The sea-people on the other hand were
dangerous foes. They were called the Etruscans and they were (and still
are) one of the great mysteries of history. Nobody knew (or knows)
whence they came; who they were; what had driven them away from their
original homes. We have found the remains of their cities and their
cemeteries and their waterworks all along the Italian coast. We are
familiar with their inscriptions. But as no one has ever been able to
decipher the Etruscan alphabet, these written messages are, so far,
merely annoying and not at all useful.
Our best guess is that the Etruscans came originally from Asia Minor
and that a great war or a pestilence in that country had forced them to
go away and seek a new home elsewhere. Whatever the reason for their
coming, the Etruscans played a great rôle in history. They carried
the pollen of the ancient civilisation from the east to the west and
they taught the Romans who, as we know, came from the north, the first
principles of architecture and street-building and fighting and art and
cookery and medicine and astronomy.
But just as the Greeks had not loved their Ægean teachers, in this
same way did the Romans hate their Etruscan masters. They got rid of
them as soon as they could and the opportunity offered itself when
Greek merchants discovered the commercial possibilities of Italy and
when the first Greek vessels reached Rome. The Greeks came to trade,
but they stayed to instruct. They found the tribes who inhabited the
Roman country-side (and who were called the Latins) quite willing to
learn such things as might be of practical use. At once they understood
the great benefit that could be derived from a written alphabet and
they copied that of the Greeks. They also understood the commercial
advantages of a well-regulated system of coins and measures and
weights. Eventually the Romans swallowed Greek civilisation hook, line
and sinker.
They even welcomed the Gods of the Greeks to their country. Zeus was
taken to Rome where he became known as Jupiter and the other divinities
followed him. The Roman Gods however never were quite like their
cheerful cousins who had accompanied the Greeks on their road through
life and through history. The Roman Gods were State Functionaries. Each
one managed his own department with great prudence and a deep sense of
justice, but in turn he was exact in demanding the obedience of his
worshippers. This obedience the Romans rendered with scrupulous care.
But they never established the cordial personal relations and that
charming friendship which had existed between the old Hellenes and the
mighty residents of the high Olympian peak.
The Romans did not imitate the Greek form of government, but being of
the same Indo-European stock as the people of Hellas, the early history
of Rome resembles that of Athens and the other Greek cities. They did
not find it difficult to get rid of their kings, the descendants of the
ancient tribal chieftains. But once the kings had been driven from the
city, the Romans were forced to bridle the power of the nobles, and it
took many centuries before they managed to establish a system which
gave every free citizen of Rome a chance to take a personal interest in
the affairs of his town.
Thereafter the Romans enjoyed one great advantage over the Greeks. They
managed the affairs of their country without making too many speeches.
They were less imaginative than the Greeks and they preferred an ounce
of action to a pound of words. They understood the tendency of the
multitude (the “plebs,” as the assemblage of free citizens was called)
only too well to waste valuable time upon mere talk. They therefore
placed the actual business of running the city into the hands of two
“consuls” who were assisted by a council of Elders, called the Senate
(because the word “senex” means an old man). As a matter of custom and
practical advantage the senators were elected from the nobility. But
their power had been strictly defined.
Rome at one time had passed through the same sort of struggle between
the poor and the rich which had forced Athens to adopt the laws of
Draco and Solon. In Rome this conflict had occurred in the fifth
century B.C. As a result the freemen had obtained a written code of
laws which protected them against the despotism of the aristocratic
judges by the institution of the “Tribune.” These Tribunes were
city-magistrates, elected by the freemen. They had the right to protect
any citizen against those actions of the government officials which
were thought to be unjust. A consul had the right to condemn a man to
death, but if the case had not been absolutely proved the Tribune could
interfere and save the poor fellow’s life.
But when I use the word Rome, I seem to refer to a little city of a few
thousand inhabitants. And the real strength of Rome lay in the country
districts outside her walls. And it was in the government of these
outlying provinces that Rome at an early age showed her wonderful gift
as a colonising power.
In very early times Rome had been the only strongly fortified city
in central Italy, but it had always offered a hospitable refuge
to other Latin tribes who happened to be in danger of attack. The
Latin neighbours had recognised the advantages of a close union with
such a powerful friend and they had tried to find a basis for some
sort of defensive and offensive alliance. Other nations, Egyptians,
Babylonians, Phœnicians, even Greeks, would have insisted upon a treaty
of submission on the part of the “barbarians.” The Romans did nothing
of the sort. They gave the “outsider” a chance to become partners in a
common “res publica”—or common-wealth.
“You want to join us,” they said. “Very well, go ahead and join. We
shall treat you as if you were full-fledged citizens of Rome. In return
for this privilege we expect you to fight for our city, the mother of
us all, whenever it shall be necessary.”
The “outsider” appreciated this generosity and he showed his gratitude
by his unswerving loyalty.
Whenever a Greek city had been attacked, the foreign residents had
moved out as quickly as they could. Why defend something which meant
nothing to them but a temporary boarding house in which they were
tolerated as long as they paid their bills? But when the enemy was
before the gates of Rome, all the Latins rushed to her defence. It was
their Mother who was in danger. It was their true “home” even if they
lived a hundred miles away and had never seen the walls of the sacred
Hills.
No defeat and no disaster could change this sentiment. In the beginning
of the fourth century B.C. the wild Gauls forced their way into Italy.
They had defeated the Roman army near the River Allia and had marched
upon the city. They had taken Rome and then they expected that the
people would come and sue for peace. They waited, but nothing happened.
After a short time the Gauls found themselves surrounded by a hostile
population which made it impossible for them to obtain supplies. After
seven months, hunger forced them to withdraw. The policy of Rome to
treat the “foreigner” on equal terms had proved a great success and
Rome stood stronger than ever before.
This short account of the early history of Rome shows you the enormous
difference between the Roman ideal of a healthy state, and that of the
ancient world which was embodied in the town of Carthage. The Romans
counted upon the cheerful and hearty co-operation between a number
of “equal citizens.” The Carthaginians, following the example of
Egypt and western Asia, insisted upon the unreasoning (and therefore
unwilling) obedience of “Subjects” and when these failed they hired
professional soldiers to do their fighting for them.
You will now understand why Carthage was bound to fear such a clever
and powerful enemy and why the plutocracy of Carthage was only too
willing to pick a quarrel that they might destroy the dangerous rival
before it was too late.
[Illustration: A FAST ROMAN WARSHIP]
But the Carthaginians, being good business men, knew that it never pays
to rush matters. They proposed to the Romans that their respective
cities draw two circles on the map and that each town claim one of
these circles as her own “sphere of influence” and promise to keep out
of the other fellow’s circle. The agreement was promptly made and was
broken just as promptly when both sides thought it wise to send their
armies to Sicily where a rich soil and a bad government invited foreign
interference.
The war which followed (the so-called first Punic War) lasted
twenty-four years. It was fought out on the high seas and in the
beginning it seemed that the experienced Carthaginian navy would
defeat the newly created Roman fleet. Following their ancient tactics,
the Carthaginian ships would either ram the enemy vessels or by a
bold attack from the side they would break their oars and would then
kill the sailors of the helpless vessel with their arrows and with
fire balls. But Roman engineers invented a new craft which carried a
boarding bridge across which the Roman infantrymen stormed the hostile
ship. Then there was a sudden end to Carthaginian victories. At the
battle of Mylae their fleet was badly defeated. Carthage was obliged to
sue for peace, and Sicily became part of the Roman domains.
Twenty-three years later new trouble arose. Rome (in quest of copper)
had taken the island of Sardinia. Carthage (in quest of silver)
thereupon occupied all of southern Spain. This made Carthage a direct
neighbour of the Romans. The latter did not like this at all and they
ordered their troops to cross the Pyrenees and watch the Carthaginian
army of occupation.
The stage was set for the second outbreak between the two rivals. Once
more a Greek colony was the pretext for a war. The Carthaginians were
besieging Saguntum on the east coast of Spain. The Saguntians appealed
to Rome and Rome, as usual, was willing to help. The Senate promised
the help of the Latin armies, but the preparation for this expedition
took some time, and meanwhile Saguntum had been taken and had been
destroyed. This had been done in direct opposition to the will of Rome.
The Senate decided upon war. One Roman army was to cross the African
sea and make a landing on Carthaginian soil. A second division was to
keep the Carthaginian armies occupied in Spain to prevent them from
rushing to the aid of the home town. It was an excellent plan and
everybody expected a great victory. But the Gods had decided otherwise.
[Illustration: HANNIBAL CROSSES THE ALPS]
It was the fall of the year 218 before the birth of Christ and the
Roman army which was to attack the Carthaginians in Spain had left
Italy. People were eagerly waiting for news of an easy and complete
victory when a terrible rumour began to spread through the plain of the
Po. Wild mountaineers, their lips trembling with fear, told of hundreds
of thousands of brown men accompanied by strange beasts “each one as
big as a house,” who had suddenly emerged from the clouds of snow which
surrounded the old Graian pass through which Hercules, thousands of
years before, had driven the oxen of Geryon on his way from Spain to
Greece. Soon an endless stream of bedraggled refugees appeared before
the gates of Rome, with more complete details. Hannibal, the son of
Hamilcar, with fifty thousand soldiers, nine thousand horsemen and
thirty-seven fighting elephants, had crossed the Pyrenees. He had
defeated the Roman army of Scipio on the banks of the Rhone and he had
guided his army safely across the mountain passes of the Alps although
it was October and the roads were thickly covered with snow and ice.
Then he had joined forces with the Gauls and together they had defeated
a second Roman army just before they crossed the Trebia and laid siege
to Placentia, the northern terminus of the road which connected Rome
with the province of the Alpine districts.
The Senate, surprised but calm and energetic as usual, hushed up the
news of these many defeats and sent two fresh armies to stop the
invader. Hannibal managed to surprise these troops on a narrow road
along the shores of the Trasimene Lake and there he killed all the
Roman officers and most of their men. This time there was a panic among
the people of Rome, but the Senate kept its nerve. A third army was
organised and the command was given to Quintus Fabius Maximus with full
power to act “as was necessary to save the state.”
Fabius knew that he must be very careful lest all be lost. His raw
and untrained men, the last available soldiers, were no match for
Hannibal’s veterans. He refused to accept battle but forever he
followed Hannibal, destroyed everything eatable, destroyed the roads,
attacked small detachments and generally weakened the morale of the
Carthaginian troops by a most distressing and annoying form of guerilla
warfare.
[Illustration: HANNIBAL AND THE C. E. F.]
Such methods however did not satisfy the fearsome crowds who had found
safety behind the walls of Rome. They wanted “action.” Something must
be done and must be done quickly. A popular hero by the name of Varro,
the sort of man who went about the city telling everybody how much
better he could do things than slow old Fabius, the “Delayer,” was made
commander-in-chief by popular acclamation. At the battle of Cannae
(216) he suffered the most terrible defeat of Roman history. More than
seventy thousand men were killed. Hannibal was master of all Italy.
He marched from one end of the peninsula to the other, proclaiming
himself the “deliverer from the yoke of Rome” and asking the different
provinces to join him in warfare upon the mother city. Then once more
the wisdom of Rome bore noble fruit. With the exceptions of Capua and
Syracuse, all Roman cities remained loyal. Hannibal, the deliverer,
found himself opposed by the people whose friend he pretended to be.
He was far away from home and did not like the situation. He sent
messengers to Carthage to ask for fresh supplies and new men. Alas,
Carthage could not send him either.
The Romans with their boarding-bridges, were the masters of the sea.
Hannibal must help himself as best he could. He continued to defeat
the Roman armies that were sent out against him, but his own numbers
were decreasing rapidly and the Italian peasants held aloof from this
self-appointed “deliverer.”
After many years of uninterrupted victories, Hannibal found himself
besieged in the country which he had just conquered. For a moment,
the luck seemed to turn. Hasdrubal, his brother, had defeated the
Roman armies in Spain. He had crossed the Alps to come to Hannibal’s
assistance. He sent messengers to the south to tell of his arrival and
ask the other army to meet him in the plain of the Tiber. Unfortunately
the messengers fell into the hands of the Romans and Hannibal waited
in vain for further news until his brother’s head, neatly packed in a
basket, came rolling into his camp and told him of the fate of the last
of the Carthaginian troops.
With Hasdrubal out of the way, young Publius Scipio easily reconquered
Spain and four years later the Romans were ready for a final attack
upon Carthage. Hannibal was called back. He crossed the African Sea
and tried to organise the defences of his home-city. In the year 202
at the battle of Zama, the Carthaginians were defeated. Hannibal fled
to Tyre. From there he went to Asia Minor to stir up the Syrians
and the Macedonians against Rome. He accomplished very little but
his activities among these Asiatic powers gave the Romans an excuse
to carry their warfare into the territory of the east and annex the
greater part of the Ægean world.
[Illustration: THE DEATH OF HANNIBAL]
Driven from one city to another, a fugitive without a home, Hannibal
at last knew that the end of his ambitious dream had come. His beloved
city of Carthage had been ruined by the war. She had been forced to
sign a terrible peace. Her navy had been sunk. She had been forbidden
to make war without Roman permission. She had been condemned to pay the
Romans millions of dollars for endless years to come. Life offered no
hope of a better future. In the year 190 B.C. Hannibal took poison and
killed himself.
Forty years later, the Romans forced their last war upon Carthage.
Three long years the inhabitants of the old Phœnician colony held out
against the power of the new republic. Hunger forced them to surrender.
The few men and women who had survived the siege were sold as slaves.
The city was set on fire. For two whole weeks the store-houses and
the palaces and the great arsenal burned. Then a terrible curse was
pronounced upon the blackened ruins and the Roman legions returned to
Italy to enjoy their victory.
For the next thousand years, the Mediterranean remained a European sea.
But as soon as the Roman Empire had been destroyed, Asia made another
attempt to dominate this great inland sea, as you will learn when I
tell you about Mohammed.