约婚夫妇· Kabanata 5

Kabanata Kabanata 5 · Chapter V

.

Father Christopher perceived immediately, from the countenances of Lucy

and her mother, that some evil had occurred. “Is all well with you?”

said he. Lucy replied by a flood of tears. “Quiet yourself, poor child,”

continued he; “and do you,” turning to Agnes, “tell me what is the

matter.” Whilst the good dame proceeded with the melancholy relation, he

experienced a variety of painful emotions. The story being done, he

buried his face in his hands, and exclaimed, “Oh, blessed God! how

long?”—He then turned to Lucy; “Poor child! God has, indeed, visited

you,” said he.

“You will not abandon us, father?” said Lucy, sobbing.

“Abandon you!” replied he. “How should I dare ask the protection

of Almighty God for myself, if I abandoned _you_! You, so

defenceless!—you, whom he has confided to me! Take courage! He will

assist you—His eye beholds you—He can even make use of a feeble

instrument like myself to confound a ——. Let us think what can be

done.”

Thus saying, he grasped his beard and chin with his hand, as if to

concentrate more completely the powers of his mind. But the more clearly

he perceived the pressing nature of the case, the more uncertain and

dangerous appeared every mode of meeting it. To endeavour to make Don

Abbondio sensible of a failure in duty? This appeared hopeless; fear was

more powerful with him than either shame or duty. To inform the cardinal

archbishop, and invoke his authority? That would require time; and, in

the meanwhile, what was to be done? To resist Don Roderick? How?

Impossible! The affair being one of a private nature, he would not be

sustained by the brethren of his order: he would, perhaps, be raising a

storm against himself; and, what was worse, by a useless attempt render

the condition of Lucy more hopeless and deplorable. After many

reflections he came to the conclusion to go to Don Roderick himself, and

to endeavour by prayers and representations of the punishments of the

wicked in another state, to win him from his infamous purpose. At least

he might at the interview discover something of his intentions, and

determine his measures accordingly. At this moment Renzo, who, as the

reader will readily imagine, could not long be absent at so interesting

a crisis, appeared at the door of the room; the father raised his head

and bowed to him affectionately, and with a look of intense pity.

“Have they told you, father?” enquired he, with a troubled voice.

“Yes, my son; and on that account I am here.”

“What do you say of the villain?”

“What do I say of _him_? I say to _you_, dear Renzo, that you must

confide in God, and He will not abandon you.”

“Blessed words!” exclaimed the youth: “you are not one of those who

wrong the poor. But the curate and this doctor——”

“Do not torment yourself uselessly: I am but a poor friar; but I repeat

to you that which I have already said to Lucy and her mother—poor as I

am, I will never abandon you.”

“Oh! you are not like the friends of the world—rascals—when I was in

prosperity, abundant in protestations; ready to shed their blood for me,

to sustain me against the devil! Had I an enemy, they would soon put it

out of his power to molest me! And now, to see them withdraw

themselves!” He was interrupted in his vituperations by the dark shade

which passed over the countenance of his auditor; he perceived the

blunder he had made, and attempting to remedy it, became perplexed and

confused. “I would say—I did not at all intend—that is, I meant to

say——”

“What did you mean to say? You have already begun to mar my undertaking.

It is well that thou art undeceived in time. What! thou didst seek

friends! and what friends! they could not have aided thee, had they been

willing. And thou didst not apply to the only friend who can and will

protect thee;—dost thou not know that God is the friend of all who

trust in Him? dost thou not know that to spread the talons does little

good to the weak? and even if——” at these words he grasped forcibly

Renzo’s arm; his countenance, without losing his wonted authority,

displayed an affecting remorse; his eyes were fixed on the ground; and

his voice became slow and sepulchral: “and even if that little should be

gained, how terribly awful! Renzo, will you confide in me?—that I

should say in me! a worm of the dust! will you not confide in God?”

“Oh! yes!” replied Renzo; “He only is the Lord.”

“Promise me, then, that you will not meet or provoke any one; that you

will suffer yourself to be guided by me.”

“I promise,” said Renzo.

Lucy drew a long breath, as if relieved from a weight, and Agnes was

loud in applauses.

“Listen, my children,” resumed Father Christopher: “I will go myself

to-day to speak to this man: if God touches his heart through my words,

well; if not, _He_ will provide some other remedy. In the mean time keep

yourselves quiet and retired; this evening, or to-morrow at the latest,

you shall see me again.” Having said this, he departed amidst thanks and

blessings.

He arrived at the convent in time to perform his daily duty in the

choir, dined, and then pursued his way towards the den of the wild beast

he had undertaken to tame.

The palace of Don Roderick stood by itself, on the summit of one of the

promontories that skirt the coast; it was three or four miles distant

from the village; at the foot of the promontory nearest the lake, there

was a cluster of decayed cottages inhabited by peasantry belonging to

Don Roderick. This was the little capital of his little kingdom. As you

cast a glance within their walls, you beheld suspended to them various

kinds of arms, with spades, mattocks, and pouches of powder, blended

promiscuously. The persons within appeared robust and strong, with a

daring and insulting expression of countenance, and wearing a long lock

of hair on the head, which was covered with net-work. The aged, that had

lost their teeth, seemed ready to show their gums at the slightest call:

masculine women, with sinewy arms, seemed disposed to use them with as

much indifference as their tongues; the very children exhibited the same

daring recklessness as the parent stock. Friar Christopher passed

through the hamlet, ascending a winding path which conducted him to the

little esplanade in the front of the castle. The door was shut, which

was a sign that the chief was dining and did not wish to be disturbed.

The few windows that looked on the road were small and decayed by time;

they were, however, secured by large iron bars; and the lowest of them

were more than ten feet from the ground. A profound silence reigned

within, and a traveller might have believed the mansion deserted, but

for the appearance of four animals, two alive and two dead, in front of

the castle. Two large vultures, with their wings expanded, were nailed

each at the posts of the gate; and two bravoes, extended at full length

on the benches on either side, were keeping guard until their master

should have finished his repast. The father stopped, as if willing also

to wait. “Father, father, come on,” said one, “we do not make the

capuchins wait here; we are the friends of the convent; I have been

within its walls when the air on the outside of them was not very

wholesome for me; it was well the fathers did not refuse me admittance.”

So saying, he gave two strokes with the knocker: at the sound, the howls

of mastiffs were heard from within; and in a few moments there appeared

an aged domestic. On seeing the father, he bowed reverently, quieted the

animals with his voice, introduced the guest into a narrow court, and

closed the gate. Then escorting him into a saloon, and regarding him

with an astonished and respectful look, said, “Is not this—the Father

Christopher of Pescarenico?”

“The same.”

“And here!”

“As you see, good man.”

“It must be to do good,” continued he, murmuring between his teeth;

“good can be done every where.” He then guided him through two or three

dark halls, and led the way to the banqueting room: here was heard a

confused noise of plates, and knives and forks, and discordant voices.

Whilst Father Christopher was urging the domestic to suffer him to

remain in some other apartment until the dinner should be finished, the

door opened. A certain Count Attilio, a cousin of the noble host, (of

whom we have already spoken, without giving his name,) was seated

opposite: when he saw the bald head and habit of the father, and

perceived his motion to withdraw, “Ho! father,” cried he, “you sha’n’t

escape us; reverend father, forward, forward!” Don Roderick seconded

somewhat unwillingly this boisterous command, as he felt some

presentiment of the object of his visit. “Come, father, come in,” said

he. Seeing there was no retreating, Father Christopher advanced,

saluting the nobleman and his guests.

An honest man is generally fearless and undaunted in presence of the

wicked; nevertheless, the father, with the testimony of a good

conscience and a firm conviction of the justice of his cause, with a

mixture of horror and compassion for Don Roderick, felt a degree of

embarrassment in approaching him. He was seated at table, surrounded by

guests; on his right was Count Attilio, his colleague in libertinism,

who had come from Milan to visit him. To the left was seated, with

respectful submissiveness, tempered, however, with conscious security,

the _podestà_ of the place,—he whose duty it was, according to the

proclamation, to cause justice to be done to Renzo Tramaglino, and to

inflict the allotted penalty on Don Roderick. Nearly opposite to the

_podestà_ sat our learned Doctor _Azzecca Garbugli_, with his black cap

and his red nose; and over against him two obscure guests, of whom our

story says nothing beyond a general mention of their toad-eating

qualities.

“Give a seat to the father,” said Don Roderick. A servant presented a

chair, and the good father apologised for having come at so inopportune

an hour. “I would speak with you alone on an affair of importance,”

added he, in a low tone, to Don Roderick.

“Very well, father, it shall be so,” replied he; “but in the meanwhile

bring the father something to drink.”

Father Christopher would have refused, but Don Roderick, raising his

voice above the tumult of the table, cried, “No, by Bacchus, you shall

not do me this wrong; a capuchin shall never leave this house without

having tasted my wine, nor an insolent creditor without having tasted

the wood of my forests.” These words produced a universal laugh, and

interrupted for a moment the question which was hotly agitated between

the guests. A servant brought the wine, of which Father Christopher

partook, feeling the necessity of propitiating the host.

“The authority of Tasso is against you, respected Signor _Podestà_,”

resumed aloud the Count Attilio: “this great man was well acquainted

with the laws of knighthood, and he makes the messenger of Argantes,

before carrying the defiance of the Christian knights, ask permission

from the pious Bouillon.”

“But that,” replied vociferously the _podestà_, “that is poetical

licence merely: an ambassador is in his nature inviolable, by the law of

nations, _jure gentium_; and moreover, the ambassador, not having spoken

in his own name, but merely presented the challenge in writing——”

“But when will you comprehend that this ambassador was a daring fool,

who did not know the first——”

“With the good leave of our guests,” interrupted Don Roderick, who did

not wish the argument to proceed farther, “we will refer it to the

Father Christopher, and submit to his decision.”

“Agreed,” said Count Attilio, amused at submitting a question of

knighthood to a capuchin; whilst the _podestà_ muttered between his

teeth, “Folly!”

“But, from what I have comprehended,” said the father, “it is a subject

of which I have no knowledge.”

“As usual, modest excuses from the father,” said Don Roderick; “but we

will not accept them. Come, come, we know well that you came not into

the world with a cowl on your head; you know something of its ways.

Well, how stands the argument?”

“The facts are these,” said the Count Attilio——

“Let me tell, who am neutral, cousin,” resumed Don Roderick. “This is

the story: a Spanish knight sent a challenge to a Milanese knight; the

bearer, not finding him at home, presented it to his brother, who,

having read it, struck the bearer many blows. The question is——”

“It was well done; he was perfectly right,” cried Count Attilio.

“There was no right about it,” exclaimed the _podestà_. “To beat an

ambassador—a man whose person is sacred! Father, do _you_ think this

was an action becoming a knight?”

“Yes, sir; of a knight,” cried the count, “I think I know what belongs

to a knight. Oh! if it had been an affair of fists, that would have

been quite another thing, but a cudgel soils no one’s hands.”

“I am not speaking of this, Sir Count; I am speaking of the _laws_ of

knighthood. But tell me, I pray you, if the messengers that the ancient

Romans sent to bear defiance to other nations, asked permission to

deliver the message; find, if you can, a writer who relates that such

messenger was ever cudgelled.”

“What have the ancient Romans to do with us? a people well enough in

some things, but in others, far, far behind. But according to the laws

of modern knighthood, I maintain that a messenger, who dared place in

the hands of a knight a challenge without having previously asked

permission, is a rash fool who deserves to be cudgelled.”

“But answer me this question——”

“No, no, no.”

“But hear me. To strike an unarmed person is an act of treachery.

_Atqui_ the messenger _de quo_ was without arms. _Ergo_——”

“Gently, gently, Signor _Podestà_.”

“How? gently.”

“Gently, I tell you; I concede that under other circumstances this might

have been called an act of treachery, but to strike a low fellow! It

would have been a fine thing truly, to say to him, as you would to a

gentleman, Be on your guard! And you, Sir Doctor, instead of sitting

there grinning your approbation of my opinion, why do you not aid me to

convince this gentleman?”

“I,” replied the doctor in confusion; “I enjoy this learned dispute, and

am thankful for the opportunity of listening to a war of wit so

agreeable. And moreover, I am not competent to give an opinion; his most

illustrious lordship has appointed a judge—the father.”

“True,” said Don Roderick; “but how can the judge speak when the

disputants will not keep silence?”

“I am dumb,” said the Count Attilio. The _podestà_ made a sign that he

would be quiet.

“Well! father! at last!” said Don Roderick, with comic gravity.

“I have already said, that I do not comprehend——”

“No excuses! we must have your opinion.”

“If it must be so,” replied the father, “I should humbly think there was

no necessity for challenges, nor bearers, nor blows.”

The guests looked in wonder at each other.

“Oh! how ridiculous!” said the Count Attilio. “Pardon me, father; but

this is exceedingly ridiculous. It is plain you know nothing of the

world.”

“He?” said Don Roderick; “he knows as much of it as you do, cousin. Is

it not so, father?”

Father Christopher made no reply; but to himself he said, “submit

thyself to every insult for the sake of those for whom thou art here.”

“It may be so,” said the count; “but the father——how is the father

called?”

“Father Christopher,” replied more than one.

“But, Father Christopher, your reverend worship, with your maxims you

would turn the world upside down—without challenges! without blows!

Farewell, the point of honour! Impunity to ruffians! Happily, the thing

is impossible.”

“Stop, doctor,” cried Don Roderick, wishing to divert the dispute from

the original antagonists. “You are a good man for an argument; what have

you to say to the father?”

“Indeed,” replied the doctor, brandishing his fork in the air—“indeed I

cannot understand how the Father Christopher should not remember that

his judgment, though of just weight in the pulpit, is worth nothing—I

speak with great submission—on a question of knighthood. But perhaps he

has been merely jesting, to relieve himself from embarrassment.”

The father not replying to this, Don Roderick made an effort to change

the subject.

“Apropos,” said he, “I understand there is a report at Milan of an

accommodation.”

There was at this time a contest regarding the succession to the dukedom

of Mantua, of which, at the death of Vincenzo Gonzaga, who died without

male issue, the Duke de Nevers, his nearest relation, had obtained

possession. Louis XIII., or rather the Cardinal de Richelieu, wished to

sustain him there; Philip IV., or rather the Count d’Olivares, commonly

called the Count Duke, opposed him. The dukedom was then a fief of the

empire, and the two parties employed intrigue and importunity at the

court of the Emperor Ferdinand II. The object of one was to obtain the

investiture of the new duke; of the other, the denial of his claim, and

also assistance to oblige him to relinquish it.

“I rather think,” said the Count Attilio, “that the thing will be

arranged satisfactorily. I have reasons——”

“Do not believe it, count, do not believe it,” added the _podestà_; “I

have an opportunity of knowing, because the Spanish keeper of the

castle, who is my friend, and who is the son of a dependant of the Count

Duke, is informed of every thing.”

“I tell you I have discoursed on the subject daily at Milan; and I know

from good authority that the pope, exceedingly interested as he is for

peace, has made propositions——”

“That may be, the thing is in order; his Holiness does his duty; a pope

should always endeavour to make peace between Christian princes; but the

Count Duke has his own policy, and——”

“And, and, and, do you know, Signor _Podestà_, how much thought the

emperor now gives to it? Do you believe there is no place but Mantua in

the world! There are many things to provide for, signor, mind. Do you

know, for instance, how far the emperor can trust this Prince of

Valdistano, or di Vallistai, as they call him; and if——”

“His name, in the German language,” interrupted the magistrate, “is

Wallenstein, as I have heard it uttered many times by the Spanish keeper

of the castle. But be of good courage——”

“Do you dare teach me,” replied the count. Here Don Roderick whispered

to him to cease contradiction, as there would be no end to it. He

obeyed; and the _podestà_, like a vessel unimpeded by shoals, continued

with full sails the course of his eloquence. “Wallenstein gives me but

little anxiety; because the Count Duke has his eye every where; and if

Wallenstein carries matters with a high hand, he will soon set him

right. He has his eye every where, I say, and unlimited power; and if it

is his policy that the Signor Duke of Nevers should not take root in

Mantua, he will never flourish there, be assured. It makes me laugh to

see the Signor Cardinal de Richelieu contend with an Olivares. The Count

Duke, gentlemen,” pursued he, with the wind still in his favour, and

much wondering at not meeting with opposition, “the Count Duke is an old

fox—speaking with due respect—who would make any one lose his track:

when he appears to go to the right, it would be safest to follow him to

the left: no one can boast of knowing his designs; they who are to

execute them, they who write the despatches, know nothing of them. I

speak from authority, for the keeper of the castle deigns to confide in

me. The Count Duke knows well enough how the pot boils in all the courts

in Europe; and these politicians have hardly laid a plan, but he begins

to frustrate it. That poor man, the Cardinal Richelieu, attempts and

dissembles, toils and strives; and what does it all produce? When he has

dug the mine, he finds a countermine already prepared by the Count

Duke——”

None can tell when the magistrate would have cast anchor, if Don

Roderick had not interrupted him. “Signor _Podestà_,” said he, “and you,

gentlemen, a bumper to the Count Duke, and you shall then judge if the

wine is worthy of the personage.” The _podestà_ bowed low in gratitude

for an honour he considered as paid to himself in part for his eloquent

harangue.

“May Don Gaspero Guzman, Count de Olivares, Duke of St. Lucar, live a

thousand years!” said he, raising his glass.

“May he live a thousand years!” exclaimed all the company.

“Help the father,” said Don Roderick.

“Excuse me,” replied he, “I could not——”

“How!” said Don Roderick; “will you not drink to the Count Duke? Would

you have us believe that you hold to the Navarre party?”

This was the contemptuous term applied to the French interest at the

time of Henry IV.

There was no reply to be made to this, and the father was obliged to

taste the wine. All the guests were loud in its praise, except the

doctor, who had kept silence. “Eh! doctor,” asked Don Roderick, “what

think _you_ of it?”

“I think,” replied the doctor, withdrawing his ruddy and shining nose

from the glass, “that this is the Olivares of wines: there is not a

liquor resembling it in all the twenty-two kingdoms of the king our

master, whom God protect! I maintain that the dinners of the most

illustrious Signor Don Roderick exceed the suppers of Heliogabalus, and

that scarcity is banished for ever from this palace, where reigns a

perpetual and splendid abundance.”

“Well said! bravo! bravo!” exclaimed with one voice the guests; but the

word _scarcity_, which the doctor had accidentally uttered, suggested a

new and painful subject. All spoke at once:—“There is no famine,” said

one, “it is the speculators who——”

“And the bakers, who conceal the grain. Hang them!”

“That is right; hang them, without mercy.”

“Upon fair trial,” cried the magistrate.

“What trial?” cried Attilio, more loudly; “summary justice, I say. Take

a few of them who are known to be the richest and most avaricious, and

hang them.”

“Yes, hang them! hang them! and there will be grain scattered in

abundance.”

Thus the party continued absorbing the wine, whose praises, mixed with

sentences of economical jurisprudence, formed the burthen of the

conversation; so that the loudest and most frequent words were, _Nectar,

and hang ’em_.

Don Roderick had, from time to time, during this confusion, looked at

the father: perceiving him calmly, but firmly, awaiting his leisure for

the interview which had been promised him, he relinquished the hope of

wearying him by its postponement. To send away a capuchin, without

giving him an audience, was not according to his policy; and since it

could not be avoided, he resolved to meet it at once: he rose from the

table, excused himself to his guests, and saying proudly, “At your

service, father,” led the way to another room.