Kabanata Kabanata 46 · The Mercantile System
HOW THE NEWLY FOUNDED NATIONAL OR DYNASTIC STATES OF EUROPE TRIED
TO MAKE THEMSELVES RICH AND WHAT WAS MEANT BY THE MERCANTILE SYSTEM
We have seen how, during the sixteenth and the seventeenth centuries,
the states of our modern world began to take shape. Their origins
were different in almost every case. Some had been the result of the
deliberate effort of a single king. Others had happened by chance.
Still others had been the result of favourable natural geographic
boundaries. But once they had been founded, they had all of them tried
to strengthen their internal administration and to exert the greatest
possible influence upon foreign affairs. All this of course had cost a
great deal of money. The mediæval state with its lack of centralised
power did not depend upon a rich treasury. The king got his revenues
from the crown domains and his civil service paid for itself. The
modern centralised state was a more complicated affair. The old knights
disappeared and hired government officials or bureaucrats took their
place. Army, navy, and internal administration demanded millions. The
question then became—where was this money to be found?
[Illustration: THE VOYAGE OF THE PILGRIMS]
Gold and silver had been a rare commodity in the middle ages. The
average man, as I have told you, never saw a gold piece as long as he
lived. Only the inhabitants of the large cities were familiar with
silver coin. The discovery of America and the exploitation of the
Peruvian mines changed all this. The centre of trade was transferred
from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic seaboard. The old “commercial
cities” of Italy lost their financial importance. New “commercial
nations” took their place and gold and silver were no longer a
curiosity.
Through Spain and Portugal and Holland and England, precious metals
began to find their way to Europe. The sixteenth century had its own
writers on the subject of political economy and they evolved a theory
of national wealth which seemed to them entirely sound and of the
greatest possible benefit to their respective countries. They reasoned
that both gold and silver were actual wealth. Therefore they believed
that the country with the largest supply of actual cash in the vaults
of its treasury and its banks was at the same time the richest country.
And since money meant armies, it followed that the richest country was
also the most powerful and could rule the rest of the world.
We call this system the “mercantile system,” and it was accepted with
the same unquestioning faith with which the early Christians believed
in Miracles and many of the present-day American business men believe
in the Tariff. In practice, the Mercantile system worked out as
follows: To get the largest surplus of precious metals a country must
have a favourable balance of export trade. If you can export more to
your neighbour than he exports to your own country, he will owe you
money and will be obliged to send you some of his gold. Hence you gain
and he loses. As a result of this creed, the economic program of almost
every seventeenth century state was as follows:
1. Try to get possession of as many precious metals as you can.
2. Encourage foreign trade in preference to domestic trade.
3. Encourage those industries which change raw materials into
exportable finished products.
4. Encourage a large population, for you will need workmen for
your factories and an agricultural community does not raise enough
workmen.
5. Let the State watch this process and interfere whenever it is
necessary to do so.
Instead of regarding International Trade as something akin to a force
of nature which would always obey certain natural laws regardless
of man’s interference, the people of the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries tried to regulate their commerce by the help of official
decrees and royal laws and financial help on the part of the government.
In the sixteenth century Charles V adopted this Mercantile System
(which was then something entirely new) and introduced it into his many
possessions. Elizabeth of England flattered him by her imitation. The
Bourbons, especially King Louis XIV, were fanatical adherents of this
doctrine and Colbert, his great minister of finance, became the prophet
of Mercantilism to whom all Europe looked for guidance.
The entire foreign policy of Cromwell was a practical application
of the Mercantile System. It was invariably directed against the
rich rival Republic of Holland. For the Dutch shippers, as the
common-carriers of the merchandise of Europe, had certain leanings
towards free-trade and therefore had to be destroyed at all cost.
It will be easily understood how such a system must affect the
colonies. A colony under the Mercantile System became merely a
reservoir of gold and silver and spices, which was to be tapped for the
benefit of the home country. The Asiatic, American and African supply
of precious metals and the raw materials of these tropical countries
became a monopoly of the state which happened to own that particular
colony. No outsider was ever allowed within the precincts and no native
was permitted to trade with a merchant whose ship flew a foreign flag.
Undoubtedly the Mercantile System encouraged the development of
young industries in certain countries where there never had been any
manufacturing before. It built roads and dug canals and made for
better means of transportation. It demanded greater skill among the
workmen and gave the merchant a better social position, while it
weakened the power of the landed aristocracy.
[Illustration: HOW EUROPE CONQUERED THE WORLD]
On the other hand, it caused very great misery. It made the natives in
the colonies the victims of a most shameless exploitation. It exposed
the citizens of the home country to an even more terrible fate. It
helped in a great measure to turn every land into an armed camp and
divided the world into little bits of territory, each working for its
own direct benefit, while striving at all times to destroy the power
of its neighbours and get hold of their treasures. It laid so much
stress upon the importance of owning wealth that “being rich” came to
be regarded as the sole virtue of the average citizen. Economic systems
come and go like the fashions in surgery and in the clothes of women,
and during the nineteenth century the Mercantile System was discarded
in favor of a system of free and open competition. At least, so I have
been told.
[Illustration: SEA POWER]