Kabanata Kabanata 27 · THE FRIAR AND THE FILIPINO
Vox populi, vox Dei
We left Isagani haranguing his friends. In the midst of his enthusiasm
an usher approached him to say that Padre Fernandez, one of the higher
professors, wished to talk with him.
Isagani’s face fell. Padre Fernandez was a person greatly respected by
him, being the one always excepted by him whenever the friars were
attacked.
“What does Padre Fernandez want?” he inquired.
The usher shrugged his shoulders and Isagani reluctantly followed him.
Padre Fernandez, the friar whom we met in Los Baños, was waiting in his
cell, grave and sad, with his brows knitted as if he were in deep
thought. He arose as Isagani entered, shook hands with him, and closed
the door. Then he began to pace from one end of the room to the other.
Isagani stood waiting for him to speak.
“Señor Isagani,” he began at length with some emotion, “from the window
I’ve heard you speaking, for though I am a consumptive I have good
ears, and I want to talk with you. I have always liked the young men
who express themselves clearly and have their own way of thinking and
acting, no matter that their ideas may differ from mine. You young men,
from what I have heard, had a supper last night. Don’t excuse
yourself—”
“I don’t intend to excuse myself!” interrupted Isagani.
“So much the better—it shows that you accept the consequences of your
actions. Besides, you would do ill in retracting, and I don’t blame
you, I take no notice of what may have been said there last night, I
don’t accuse you, because after all you’re free to say of the
Dominicans what seems best to you, you are not a pupil of ours—only
this year have we had the pleasure of having you, and we shall probably
not have you longer. Don’t think that I’m going to invoke
considerations of gratitude; no, I’m not going to waste my time in
stupid vulgarisms. I’ve had you summoned here because I believe that
you are one of the few students who act from conviction, and, as I like
men of conviction, I’m going to explain myself to Señor Isagani.”
Padre Fernandez paused, then continued his walk with bowed head, his
gaze riveted on the floor.
“You may sit down, if you wish,” he remarked. “It’s a habit of mine to
walk about while talking, because my ideas come better then.”
Isagani remained standing, with his head erect, waiting for the
professor to get to the point of the matter.
“For more than eight years I have been a professor here,” resumed Padre
Fernandez, still continuing to pace back and forth, “and in that time
I’ve known and dealt with more than twenty-five hundred students. I’ve
taught them, I’ve tried to educate them, I’ve tried to inculcate in
them principles of justice and of dignity, and yet in these days when
there is so much murmuring against us I’ve not seen one who has the
temerity to maintain his accusations when he finds himself in the
presence of a friar, not even aloud in the presence of any numbers.
Young men there are who behind our backs calumniate us and before us
kiss our hands, with a base smile begging kind looks from us! Bah! What
do you wish that we should do with such creatures?”
“The fault is not all theirs, Padre,” replied Isagani. “The fault lies
partly with those who have taught them to be hypocrites, with those who
have tyrannized over freedom of thought and freedom of speech. Here
every independent thought, every word that is not an echo of the will
of those in power, is characterized as filibusterism, and you know well
enough what that means. A fool would he be who to please himself would
say aloud what he thinks, who would lay himself liable to suffer
persecution!”
“What persecution have you had to suffer?” asked Padre Fernandez,
raising his head. “Haven’t I let you express yourself freely in my
class? Nevertheless, you are an exception that, if what you say is
true, I must correct, so as to make the rule as general as possible and
thus avoid setting a bad example.”
Isagani smiled. “I thank you, but I will not discuss with you whether I
am an exception. I will accept your qualification so that you may
accept mine: you also are an exception, and as here we are not going to
talk about exceptions, nor plead for ourselves, at least, I mean, I’m
not, I beg of my professor to change the course of the conversation.”
In spite of his liberal principles, Padre Fernandez raised his head and
stared in surprise at Isagani. That young man was more independent than
he had thought—although he called him professor, in reality he was
dealing with him as an equal, since he allowed himself to offer
suggestions. Like a wise diplomat, Padre Fernandez not only recognized
the fact but even took his stand upon it.
“Good enough!” he said. “But don’t look upon me as your professor. I’m
a friar and you are a Filipino student, nothing more nor less! Now I
ask you—what do the Filipino students want of us?”
The question came as a surprise; Isagani was not prepared for it. It
was a thrust made suddenly while they were preparing their defense, as
they say in fencing. Thus startled, Isagani responded with a violent
stand, like a beginner defending himself.
“That you do your duty!” he exclaimed.
Fray Fernandez straightened up—that reply sounded to him like a
cannon-shot. “That we do our duty!” he repeated, holding himself erect.
“Don’t we, then, do our duty? What duties do you ascribe to us?”
“Those which you voluntarily placed upon yourselves on joining the
order, and those which afterwards, once in it, you have been willing to
assume. But, as a Filipino student, I don’t think myself called upon to
examine your conduct with reference to your statutes, to Catholicism,
to the government, to the Filipino people, and to humanity in
general—those are questions that you have to settle with your founders,
with the Pope, with the government, with the whole people, and with
God. As a Filipino student, I will confine myself to your duties toward
us. The friars in general, being the local supervisors of education in
the provinces, and the Dominicans in particular, by monopolizing in
their hands all the studies of the Filipino youth, have assumed the
obligation to its eight millions of inhabitants, to Spain, and to
humanity, of which we form a part, of steadily bettering the young
plant, morally and physically, of training it toward its happiness, of
creating a people honest, prosperous, intelligent, virtuous, noble, and
loyal. Now I ask you in my turn—have the friars fulfilled that
obligation of theirs?”
“We’re fulfilling—”
“Ah, Padre Fernandez,” interrupted Isagani, “you with your hand on your
heart can say that you are fulfilling it, but with your hand on the
heart of your order, on the heart of all the orders, you cannot say
that without deceiving yourself. Ah, Padre Fernandez, when I find
myself in the presence of a person whom I esteem and respect, I prefer
to be the accused rather than the accuser, I prefer to defend myself
rather than take the offensive. But now that we have entered upon the
discussion, let us carry it to the end! How do they fulfill their
obligation, those who look after education in the towns? By hindering
it! And those who here monopolize education, those who try to mold the
mind of youth, to the exclusion of all others whomsoever, how do they
carry out their mission? By curtailing knowledge as much as possible,
by extinguishing all ardor and enthusiasm, by trampling on all dignity,
the soul’s only refuge, by inculcating in us worn-out ideas, rancid
beliefs, false principles incompatible with a life of progress! Ah,
yes, when it is a question of feeding convicts, of providing for the
maintenance of criminals, the government calls for bids in order to
find the purveyor who offers the best means of subsistence, he who at
least will not let them perish from hunger, but when it is a question
of morally feeding a whole people, of nourishing the intellect of
youth, the healthiest part, that which is later to be the country and
the all, the government not only does not ask for any bid, but
restricts the power to that very body which makes a boast of not
desiring education, of wishing no advancement. What should we say if
the purveyor for the prisons, after securing the contract by intrigue,
should then leave the prisoners to languish in want, giving them only
what is stale and rancid, excusing himself afterwards by saying that it
is not convenient for the prisoners to enjoy good health, because good
health brings merry thoughts, because merriment improves the man, and
the man ought not to be improved, because it is to the purveyor’s
interest that there be many criminals? What should we say if afterwards
the government and the purveyor should agree between themselves that of
the ten or twelve cuartos which one received for each criminal, the
other should receive five?”
Padre Fernandek bit his lip. “Those are grave charges,” he said, “and
you are overstepping the limits of our agreement.”
“No, Padre, not if I continue to deal with the student question. The
friars—and I do not say, you friars, since I do not confuse you with
the common herd—the friars of all the orders have constituted
themselves our mental purveyors, yet they say and shamelessly proclaim
that it is not expedient for us to become enlightened, because some day
we shall declare ourselves free! That is just the same as not wishing
the prisoner to be well-fed so that he may improve and get out of
prison. Liberty is to man what education is to the intelligence, and
the friars’ unwillingness that we have it is the origin of our
discontent.”
“Instruction is given only to those who deserve it,” rejoined Padre
Fernandez dryly. “To give it to men without character and without
morality is to prostitute it.”
“Why are there men without character and without morality?”
The Dominican shrugged his shoulders. “Defects that they imbibe with
their mothers’ milk, that they breathe in the bosom of the family—how
do I know?”
“Ah, no, Padre Fernandez!” exclaimed the young man impetuously. “You
have not dared to go into the subject deeply, you have not wished to
gaze into the depths from fear of finding yourself there in the
darkness of your brethren. What we are, you have made us. A people
tyrannized over is forced to be hypocritical; a people denied the truth
must resort to lies; and he who makes himself a tyrant breeds slaves.
There is no morality, you say, so let it be—even though statistics can
refute you in that here are not committed crimes like those among other
peoples, blinded by the fumes of their moralizers. But, without
attempting now to analyze what it is that forms the character and how
far the education received determines morality, I will agree with you
that we are defective. Who is to blame for that? You who for three
centuries and a half have had in your hands our education, or we who
submit to everything? If after three centuries and a half the artist
has been able to produce only a caricature, stupid indeed he must be!”
“Or bad enough the material he works upon.”
“Stupider still then, when, knowing it to be bad, he does not give it
up, but goes on wasting time. Not only is he stupid, but he is a cheat
and a robber, because he knows that his work is useless, yet continues
to draw his salary. Not only is he stupid and a thief, he is a villain
in that he prevents any other workman from trying his skill to see if
he might not produce something worth while! The deadly jealousy of the
incompetent!”
The reply was sharp and Padre Fernandez felt himself caught. To his
gaze Isagani appeared gigantic, invincible, convincing, and for the
first time in his life he felt beaten by a Filipino student. He
repented of having provoked the argument, but it was too late to turn
back. In this quandary, finding himself confronted with such a
formidable adversary, he sought a strong shield and laid hold of the
government.
“You impute all the faults to us, because you see only us, who are
near,” he said in a less haughty tone. “It’s natural and doesn’t
surprise me. A person hates the soldier or policeman who arrests him
and not the judge who sends him to prison. You and we are both dancing
to the same measure of music—if at the same note you lift your foot in
unison with us, don’t blame us for it, it’s the music that is directing
our movements. Do you think that we friars have no consciences and that
we do not desire what is right? Do you believe that we do not think
about you, that we do not heed our duty, that we only eat to live, and
live to rule? Would that it were so! But we, like you, follow the
cadence, finding ourselves between Scylla and Charybdis: either you
reject us or the government rejects us. The government commands, and he
who commands, commands,—and must be obeyed!”
“From which it may be inferred,” remarked Isagani with a bitter smile,
“that the government wishes our demoralization.”
“Oh, no, I didn’t mean that! What I meant to say is that there are
beliefs, there are theories, there are laws, which, dictated with the
best intention, produce the most deplorable consequences. I’ll explain
myself better by citing an example. To stamp out a small evil, there
are dictated many laws that cause greater evils still: ‘corruptissima
in republica plurimae leges,’ said Tacitus. To prevent one case of
fraud, there are provided a million and a half preventive or
humiliating regulations, which produce the immediate effect of
awakening in the public the desire to elude and mock such regulations.
To make a people criminal, there’s nothing more needed than to doubt
its virtue. Enact a law, not only here, but even in Spain, and you will
see how the means of evading it will be sought, and this is for the
very reason that the legislators have overlooked the fact that the more
an object is hidden, the more a sight of it is desired. Why are
rascality and astuteness regarded as great qualities in the Spanish
people, when there is no other so noble, so proud, so chivalrous as it?
Because our legislators, with the best intentions, have doubted its
nobility, wounded its pride, challenged its chivalry! Do you wish to
open in Spain a road among the rocks? Then place there an imperative
notice forbidding the passage, and the people, in order to protest
against the order, will leave the highway to clamber over the rocks.
The day on which some legislator in Spain forbids virtue and commands
vice, then all will become virtuous!”
The Dominican paused for a brief space, then resumed: “But you may say
that we are getting away from the subject, so I’ll return to it. What I
can say to you, to convince you, is that the vices from which you
suffer ought to be ascribed by you neither to us nor to the government.
They are due to the imperfect organization of our social system: qui
multum probat, nihil probat, one loses himself through excessive
caution, lacking what is necessary and having too much of what is
superfluous.”
“If you admit those defects in your social system,” replied Isagani,
“why then do you undertake to regulate alien societies, instead of
first devoting your attention to yourselves?”
“We’re getting away from the subject, young man. The theory in
accomplished facts must be accepted.”
“So let it be! I accept it because it is an accomplished fact, but I
will further ask: why, if your social organization is defective, do you
not change it or at least give heed to the cry of those who are injured
by it?”
“We’re still far away. Let’s talk about what the students want from the
friars.”
“From the moment when the friars hide themselves behind the government,
the students have to turn to it.”
This statement was true and there appeared no means of ignoring it.
“I’m not the government and I can’t answer for its acts. What do the
students wish us to do for them within the limits by which we are
confined?”
“Not to oppose the emancipation of education but to favor it.”
The Dominican shook his head. “Without stating my own opinion, that is
asking us to commit suicide,” he said.
“On the contrary, it is asking you for room to pass in order not to
trample upon and crush you.”
“Ahem!” coughed Padre Fernandez, stopping and remaining thoughtful.
“Begin by asking something that does not cost so much, something that
any one of us can grant without abatement of dignity or privilege, for
if we can reach an understanding and dwell in peace, why this hatred,
why this distrust?”
“Then let’s get down to details.”
“Yes, because if we disturb the foundation, we’ll bring down the whole
edifice.”
“Then let’s get down to details, let’s leave the region of abstract
principles,” rejoined Isagani with a smile, “and also without stating
my own opinion,”—the youth accented these words—“the students would
desist from their attitude and soften certain asperities if the
professors would try to treat them better than they have up to the
present. That is in their hands.”
“What?” demanded the Dominican. “Have the students any complaint to
make about my conduct?”
“Padre, we agreed from the start not to talk of yourself or of myself,
we’re speaking generally. The students, besides getting no great
benefit out of the years spent in the classes, often leave there
remnants of their dignity, if not the whole of it.”
Padre Fernandez again bit his lip. “No one forces them to study—the
fields are uncultivated,” he observed dryly.
“Yes, there is something that impels them to study,” replied Isagani in
the same tone, looking the Dominican full in the face. “Besides the
duty of every one to seek his own perfection, there is the desire
innate in man to cultivate his intellect, a desire the more powerful
here in that it is repressed. He who gives his gold and his life to the
State has the right to require of it opporttmity better to get that
gold and better to care for his life. Yes, Padre, there is something
that impels them, and that something is the government itself. It is
you yourselves who pitilessly ridicule the uncultured Indian and deny
him his rights, on the ground that he is ignorant. You strip him and
then scoff at his nakedness.”
Padre Fernandez did not reply, but continued to pace about feverishly,
as though very much agitated.
“You say that the fields are not cultivated,” resumed Isagani in a
changed tone, after a brief pause. “Let’s not enter upon an analysis of
the reason for this, because we should get far away. But you, Padre
Fernandez, you, a teacher, you, a learned man, do you wish a people of
peons and laborers? In your opinion, is the laborer the perfect state
at which man may arrive in his development? Or is it that you wish
knowledge for yourself and labor for the rest?”
“No, I want knowledge for him who deserves it, for him who knows how to
use it,” was the reply. “When the students demonstrate that they love
it, when young men of conviction appear, young men who know how to
maintain their dignity and make it respected, then there will be
knowledge, then there will be considerate professors! If there are now
professors who resort to abuse, it is because there are pupils who
submit to it.”
“When there are professors, there will be students!”
“Begin by reforming yourselves, you who have need of change, and we
will follow.”
“Yes,” said Isagani with a bitter laugh, “let us begin it, because the
difficulty is on our side. Well you know what is expected of a pupil
who stands before a professor—you yourself, with all your love of
justice, with all your kind sentiments, have been restraining yourself
by a great effort while I have been telling you bitter truths, you
yourself, Padre Fernandez! What good has been secured by him among us
who has tried to inculcate other ideas? What evils have not fallen upon
you because you have tried to be just and perform your duty?”
“Señor Isagani,” said the Dominican, extending his hand, “although it
may seem that nothing practical has resulted from this conversation,
yet something has been gained. I’ll talk to my brethren about what you
have told me and I hope that something can be done. Only I fear that
they won’t believe in your existence.”
“I fear the same,” returned Isagani, shaking the Dominican’s hand. “I
fear that my friends will not believe in your existence, as you have
revealed yourself to me today.” [57]
Considering the interview at an end, the young man took his leave.
Padre Fernandez opened the door and followed him with his gaze until he
disappeared around a corner in the corridor. For some time he listened
to the retreating footsteps, then went back into his cell and waited
for the youth to appear in the street.
He saw him and actually heard him say to a friend who asked where he
was going: “To the Civil Government! I’m going to see the pasquinades
and join the others!”
His startled friend stared at him as one would look at a person who is
about to commit suicide, then moved away from him hurriedly.
“Poor boy!” murmured Padre Fernandez, feeling his eyes moisten. “I
grudge you to the Jesuits who educated you.”
But Padre Fernandez was completely mistaken; the Jesuits repudiated
Isagani [58] when that afternoon they learned that he had been
arrested, saying that he would compromise them. “That young man has
thrown himself away, he’s going to do us harm! Let it be understood
that he didn’t get those ideas here.”
Nor were the Jesuits wrong. No! Those ideas come only from God through
the medium of Nature.