第 二十七 章 · Chapter XXVII

.

We have had occasion to mention more than once a war which was then

fermenting, for the succession to the states of the Duke Vincenzo

Gonzaga, the second of the name; we have said that, at the death of this

duke, his nearest heir, Carlos Gonzaga, chief of a younger branch

transplanted to France, where he possessed the duchies of Nevers and

Rhetel, had entered into possession of Mantua and Montferrat; the

Spanish minister, who wished, at any price, to exclude from these two

fiefs the new prince, and wanted some pretence to advance for his

exclusion, had declared his intention to support the claims upon Mantua

of another Gonzaga, Ferrante, Prince of Guastalla; and those upon

Montferrat of Carlos Emanuel the First, Duke of Savoy, and Margherita

Gonzaga, Duchess dowager of Lorraine. Don Gonzalo, who was descended

from the great captain whose name he bore, had already made war in

Flanders; and as he was desirous beyond measure to direct one in Italy,

he made the greatest efforts to promote it. By interpreting the

intentions, and by going beyond the orders of the minister, he had, in

the mean time, concluded with the Duke of Savoy a treaty for the

invasion and division of Montferrat; and easily obtained the

ratification of it, by the count duke, by persuading him that the

acquisition of Casale, which was the point the best defended, of the

portion granted to the King of Spain, was extremely easy. However, he

still continued to protest, in the name of his sovereign, that he

desired to occupy the country only as a trust, until the decision of the

emperor should be declared. But in the meantime the emperor, influenced

by others as well as by motives of his own, had refused the investiture

to the new duke, and ordered him to leave in sequestration, the states

which had been the subject of contention; promising, after he should

have heard both parties, to give it to the one whom he should deem

justly entitled to it. The Duke of Nevers would not submit to these

conditions.

The duke had high and powerful friends, being supported by the Cardinal

Richelieu, the senate of Venice, and the pope. But the first of these,

absorbed at the time by the siege of Rochelle, embarrassed in a war with

England, thwarted by the party of the queen mother, Mary de’ Medici,

who, for particular reasons, was hostile to the house of Nevers, could

only hold out hopes and promises. The Venetians would not stir in the

contest, until a French army arrived in Italy; and while secretly aiding

the duke, they confined themselves, in their negotiations with the court

of Madrid, and the government of Milan, to protests, offers, or even

threats, according to circumstances. Urban VIII. recommended the Duke

of Nevers to his friends, interceded for him with his adversaries, and

made propositions of peace; but he never afforded him any military aid.

The two powers, allied for offensive operations, could then securely

begin their enterprise; Carlos Emanuel entered Montferrat, and Don

Gonzalo gladly undertook the siege of Casale; but he did not meet with

the success he had anticipated. The court did not afford him all the

supplies he demanded; his ally, on the contrary, was too liberal in his

aid to the cause; for, after having taken his own portion, he also took

that which had been assigned to the King of Spain. Don Gonzalo,

inexpressibly enraged, but fearing, if he made the least complaint, that

Carlos, as active in intrigue, and as brave in arms, as he was fickle in

disposition, and false to his promises, would throw himself on the side

of France; was constrained to shut his eyes, to champ the bit, and to

maintain a satisfied appearance. Whether from the firm resistance of the

besieged, or from the small number of troops employed against them, or,

according to some statements, from the numerous mistakes of Don Gonzalo,

the siege, although protracted, was finally unsuccessful. It was at this

very period that the sedition of Milan obliged Don Gonzalo to go thither

in person.

In the relation that was there made to him, the flight of Renzo was

mentioned, and the facts, real or supposed, which had caused his arrest;

he was also informed that this man had taken refuge in the territory of

Bergamo. This latter circumstance attracted the attention of Don

Gonzalo; he knew that the Venetians had taken an interest in the

insurrection of Milan, and that, in the beginning of it, they had

imagined that, on that account alone, he would be obliged to raise the

siege of Casale, and thus incur a heavy disappointment to his hopes. In

addition to this, immediately after this event, the news was received,

so much desired by the senate, and so much dreaded by Gonzalo, of the

surrender of Rochelle. Stung to the quick, as a man and a politician,

and vexed at his loss of reputation, he sought out every occasion to

convince the Venetians, that he had lost none of his former boldness

and determination; he therefore ventured to make loud complaints of the

conduct of the senate. The resident of Venice, having come to pay his

respects to him, and endeavouring to read in his features and deportment

what was passing in his mind, Don Gonzalo spoke lightly of the tumult,

as a thing already quieted, making use, however, of the reception of

Renzo, in the Bergamascan territory, as a pretext for complaint against

the Venetians. The result is known to our readers. When he had answered

his own purposes, with the affair, it was entirely forgotten by him.

But Renzo, who was far from suspecting the little importance that was in

reality attached to him, had, for a long time, no other thought but to

keep himself concealed. It may well be supposed that he desired ardently

to send intelligence to Lucy and her mother, and to hear from them in

return. But to this, there were two very great obstacles. It was

necessary to confide in an amanuensis, as he himself was unable to

write,—an accomplishment in those days not very usual in his class; and

how could he venture to do this where all were strangers to him? The

other difficulty was to find a trusty messenger, to take charge of the

letter. He finally succeeded in overcoming these difficulties, and found

one of his companions who could write for him. But not knowing whether

Lucy and Agnes were still at Monza, he thought it best to enclose the

letter under cover to Father Christopher, with a few lines in addition

to him. The writer engaged to send it, and gave it to a man who was to

pass near Pescarenico, and who left it in an inn on the route, in a

neighbouring place to the convent, and with many injunctions for its

safe delivery. As the cover was directed to a capuchin, it was carried

to Pescarenico, but it was never known what farther became of it. Renzo,

not receiving an answer, caused another letter to be written, and

enclosed it to one of his relations at Lecco. This time the letter

reached its destination. Agnes requested her cousin Alessio to read it

for her; and to write an answer, which was sent to Antonio Rivolta, at

the place of his abode; all this, however, was not done so quickly as

we tell it. Renzo received the answer, and wrote a reply; in short,

there was a correspondence, however irregular, established between them.

But the manner of carrying on such a correspondence, which is the same,

perhaps, at this day, we will explain. The absent party who can’t write,

selects one who possesses the art, from amongst his own class, in which

he can more securely trust. To him he explains with more or less

clearness his subject and his thoughts. The man of letters comprehends

part, guesses the rest, gives an opinion, proposes an alteration, and

finishes with “leave it to me.” Then begins the translation of the

spoken into the written thoughts.—The writer corrects, improves,

overcharges, diminishes, or even omits, according to his opinion of the

graces of style. The finished letter is, accordingly, often wide of the

mark aimed at. But when, at length, it reaches the hands of a

correspondent, equally deficient in the art of reading running hand, he

is under the like necessity of finding a learned clerk of the same

calibre to interpret the hieroglyphics. Hereupon arise questions upon

the various meanings. Towards their elucidation, the one supplies

philological notices upon the text; the other, commentaries upon the

hidden matter; so that, after mature discussion, they may come to the

same understanding between themselves, however remote that may be from

the intention of the originator of the perplexity.

This was precisely the condition of our two correspondents.

The first letter from Renzo contained many details; he informed Agnes of

the circumstance of his flight, his subsequent adventures, and his

actual situation. These events, however, were rather hinted at, than

clearly explained, so that Agnes and her interpreter were far from

drawing any definite conclusions from the relation of them. He spoke of

secret information, of a change of name; that he was in safety, but that

he was obliged to keep himself concealed; further, the letter contained

pressing and passionate enquiries with regard to Lucy, with some obscure

references to the reports which had reached him, mingled with vague

expressions of hope, and plans for the future, and affectionate

exhortations to constancy and patience.

Some time after the receipt of this letter, Agnes sent Renzo an answer,

with the fifty crowns that had been assigned him by Lucy. At the sight

of so much gold, he did not know what to think; and, with his mind

agitated by reflections by no means agreeable, he went in search of his

amanuensis, requesting him to interpret the letter, and afford him a

clue to the developement of the mystery.

The amanuensis of Agnes, after some complaints on the want of clearness

in Renzo’s epistle, described the wonderful history of _this person_ (so

he called the Unknown), and thus accounted for the fifty crowns; then he

mentioned the vow, but only periphrastically; adding more explicitly the

advice, to set his heart at rest, and not to think of Lucy any more.

Renzo was very near quarrelling with his interpreter; he trembled; he

was enraged with what he had understood, and with what he had not

understood. He made him read three or four times this melancholy

epistle, sometimes understanding it better, sometimes finding obscure

and inexplicable that which at first had appeared clear. In the delirium

of his passion, he desired his amanuensis to write an answer

immediately. After the strongest expressions of pity and horror at the

misfortunes of Lucy; “Write,” pursued he, “that I do not wish to set my

heart at rest, and that I never will; that this is not advice to give

me; and that, moreover, I will never touch the money, but will keep it

in trust, as the dowry of the young girl; that Lucy belongs to me, and

that I will not abide by her vow; that I have always heard that the

Virgin interests herself in our affairs, for the purpose of aiding the

afflicted, and obtaining favour for them; but that I have never heard

that she will protect those who do evil, and fail to perform their

promises; say that, as such cannot be the case, her vow is good for

nothing; that with this money we can establish ourselves here, and that,

if our affairs are now a little perplexed, it is a storm which will soon

pass away.”

Agnes received this letter, sent an answer, and the correspondence

continued for some time, as we have related. When her mother informed

Lucy that Renzo was well and in safety, she derived great relief from

the intelligence, desiring but one thing more, which was, that he should

forget, or rather, that he should endeavour to forget her. On her part

she made a similar resolution, with respect to him, a hundred times a

day; and employing every means of which she was mistress to accomplish

so desirable an end, she applied herself incessantly to labour,

endeavouring to give to it all the powers of her soul. When the image of

Renzo occurred to her mind, she tried to banish it by prayer; but, while

thinking of her mother, (and how could she avoid thinking of her

mother?) the image of Renzo intruded himself as a third into the place

so often occupied by the real Renzo. However, if she did not succeed in

forgetting, she contrived at least to think less frequently of him; and

in this she would have been more successful, had she been left to

prosecute the work alone; but, alas! Donna Prassede, who, on her part,

was determined to drive the poor youth from her mind, thought there was

no better expedient for the purpose than to talk of him incessantly;

“Well,” said she, “do you still think of him?”

“I think of no one,” said Lucy.

Donna Prassede, who was not a woman to be satisfied with such an answer,

replied, “that she wanted actions, not words.” Discussing at length, the

tendencies of young girls, she said, “When they have once given their

heart to a libertine, it is impossible to withdraw their affections. If

their love for an honest man is, by whatever means, unfortunate, they

are soon comforted, but love for a libertine is an incurable wound.” And

then beginning the panegyric of poor Renzo, of this rascal, who wished

to deluge Milan in blood, and reduce it to ashes, she concluded, by

insisting that Lucy should confess the crimes of which he had been

guilty in his own country.

Lucy, with a voice trembling from shame, grief, and from as much

indignation as her gentle disposition and humble station permitted her,

declared and protested, that in her village this poor youth had always

acted peaceably and honourably, and had obtained a good reputation.

“She wished,” she said, “that one of his countrymen were present to bear

testimony to the truth.” Even respecting the events at Milan, of which,

’twas true, she knew not the details, she defended him, and solely on

account of the acquaintance she had had with his habits from infancy.

She defended him (or rather, she _meant_ to defend him) from the pure

duty of charity, from love of truth, and as being her neighbour. But

Donna Prassede deduced, from this defence, new arguments to convince

Lucy, that this man still held a place in her heart, of which he was not

worthy. At the degrading portrait which the old lady drew of him, the

habitual feelings of her heart, with regard to him, and her knowledge

and estimate of his character, revived with double force and

distinctness. Her recollections, which she had had so much difficulty in

subduing, returned vividly to her imagination; in proportion to the

aversion and contempt manifested by Donna Prassede towards the

unfortunate youth, just in such proportion did she recall her former

motives for esteem and sympathy; this blind and violent hatred excited

in her heart stronger pity and tenderness. Such conversations could not

be much prolonged without resolving Lucy’s words into tears.

If Donna Prassede had been led to this course of conduct by hatred

towards Lucy, the tears of the latter, which flowed freely during these

examinations, might have subdued her to silence, but as she was moved to

speak by the desire of doing good, she never suffered herself to be

softened by them; for groans and supplications may arrest the arm of an

enemy, but not the friendly lance of the surgeon. After having

reproached her for her wickedness, she passed to exhortations and

advice, mingling also a few praises, to temper the bitter with the

sweet, and obtain more certainly the effect she desired. These disputes,

which had nearly the same beginning, middle, and end, did not, however,

leave any trace of resentment against her severe lecturer in the gentle

bosom of Lucy; she was, in other respects, treated with much kindness by

the lady, and she believed her, even in this matter, to be guided by

good, though mistaken intentions. There did follow them, however, such

agitation, such uneasy awakening of slumbering thoughts, that much time

and effort were requisite to restore her to any degree of tranquillity.

It was a happiness for Lucy that Donna Prassede’s sphere of usefulness

was somewhat extensive; consequently these tiresome conversations could

not be so frequently repeated. Besides her immediate household,

composed, according to her opinion, of persons that had more or less

need of correction and regulation; and besides all the other occasions

which presented themselves for her rendering the same office from pure

benevolence to persons who required not the duty at her hands; she had

five daughters, neither of whom lived at home, but they gave her the

more trouble from that very cause. Three were nuns; and two were

married. Donna Prassede consequently had three monasteries and two

families to govern; a vast and complicated machinery, and the more

troublesome, as two husbands, supported by a numerous kindred, three

abbesses, defended by other dignitaries, and a great number of nuns,

would not accept her superintendence. There was a continual warfare,

polite indeed, but active and vigilant; a perpetual attention to avoid

her solicitude, to close up the avenues to her advice, to elude her

enquiries, and to keep her in as much ignorance as possible of their

affairs. In her own family, however, her zeal could display itself

freely; all were governed by her authority, and submissive to her, in

every respect, with the exception of Don Ferrante; with him things were

conducted in a peculiar manner.

A man of study, he neither loved to obey nor command; he was perfectly

willing that his wife should be mistress in all things pertaining to

household affairs, but not that he should be her slave; and if, at her

request, he lent upon occasion the services of his pen, it was because

he had a particular taste for such employments. And, moreover, he could

refuse to do it, when not convinced of the propriety of her demand.

“Well,” he would say, “do it yourself, since the matter appears so plain

to you.” Donna Prassede, after vainly trying to induce him to

submission, took refuge in grumbling against him as an original, a man

who would have his own way, a mere scholar; which latter title,

however, she never gave him without a degree of complacency, mingling

itself with her displeasure.

Don Ferrante passed much time in his study, where he had a considerable

collection of choice books; he had selected the most famous works on

many different subjects, in each of which he was more or less versed. In

astrology he was justly considered more than an amateur, because he not

only possessed the general notions, and the common vocabulary of

influences, aspects, and conjunctions, but he could speak to the point,

and, like a professor, of the twelve houses of heaven, of the great and

lesser circles, of degrees, lucid and obscure, of exaltations, passages,

and revolutions; in short, of the principles the most certain and most

recondite of the science. For more than twenty years, in long and

frequent disputes, he had sustained the pre-eminence of _Cardan_ against

another learned man attached to the system of _Alcabizio_, “from pure

obstinacy,” said Don Ferrante, who, in acknowledging voluntarily the

superiority of the ancients, could not, however, endure the prejudice

which would never accord to the moderns, even that which they evidently

deserved. He had also a more than ordinary acquaintance with the history

of the science; he could cite the most celebrated predictions which had

been verified, and reason very skilfully and learnedly on other

celebrated predictions which had _not_ been verified, demonstrating that

the failure was not owing to any deficiency in the science, but to the

ignorance which could not apply its principles.

He had acquired as much ancient philosophy as would have contented a man

of ordinary ambition, but he was continually adding to his stock from

the study of Diogenes Laertius; however, as we cannot adhere to every

system, and as, from among them all, a choice is necessary to him who

desires the reputation of a philosopher, Don Ferrante made choice of

Aristotle, who, as he was accustomed to say, was neither ancient nor

modern. He possessed many works of the wisest and most subtle disciples

of the school of Aristotle among the moderns; as to those of his

opponents, he would not read them, “because it would be a waste of

time,” he said, “nor buy them, because it would be a waste of money.”

In the judgment of the learned, therefore, Don Ferrante passed for an

accomplished peripatetic, although this was not the judgment he passed

on himself, for, more than once, he was heard to declare, with singular

modesty, that the essence, the universals, the soul of the world, and

the nature of things, were not matters so clear as people thought.

As to natural philosophy, he had made it more a pastime than a study: he

had rather read than digested the works of Aristotle himself on the

subject. Nevertheless, with a slight acquaintance with that author, and

the knowledge he had incidentally gathered from other treatises of

general philosophy, he could, when necessary, entertain an assembly of

learned persons in reasoning most acutely on the wonderful virtues and

singular characteristics of many plants. He could describe exactly the

forms and habits of the syrens, and the phœnix, the only one of its

kind; he could explain how it was that the salamander lived in fire, how

drops of dew became pearls in the shell, how the chameleon lived on air,

and a thousand other secrets of the same nature.

He was, however, much more addicted to the study of magic and sorcery,

as this was a science more in vogue, and withal more serviceable, and

the facts of which were of pre-eminent importance. It is not necessary

to add that, in devotion to such a science, he had no other purpose than

to obtain an accurate knowledge of the worst artifices of the sorcerers,

in order to guard himself against them. Guided by the great _Martino

Delrio_, he was able to discourse, _ex professo_, on the enchantment of

love, the enchantment of sleep, the enchantment of hatred, and on the

innumerable species of these three chief enchantments, which, alas! are

witnessed every day in their destructive and baneful effects.

His knowledge of history, especially universal history, was not less

vast and solid. “But,” said he often, “what is history without politics?

a guide who conducts without teaching any one the way; as politics

without history, is a man without a guide to conduct him.” Here was then

a small place on his shelf assigned to statistics; there, among others

of the second rank, were seen Bodin, Cavalcanti, Sansovino, Paruta, and

Boccalini. There were, however, two books that Don Ferrante preferred to

all others on the subject; two, which he called, for a long time, the

first of the kind, without deciding to which of the two this rank

exclusively belonged. One was _Il Principe_ and the _Discorsi_ of the

celebrated secretary of Florence. “A rascal, ’tis true,” said he, “but

profound;” the other, _La Ragion di Stato_, of the not less celebrated

Giovanni Botero. “An honest man, ’tis true,” said he, “but cunning.”

But, a short time before the period to which our history belongs, a work

appeared which had terminated the question of pre-eminence; a work in

which was comprised and condensed a relation of every vice, in order to

enable men to avoid it, and every virtue, in order to enable men to

practise it,—a book of few leaves, indeed, but all of gold; in a word,

the _Statista Regnante_ of _Don Valeriano Castiglione_; of the

celebrated man upon whom the most learned men emulated each other in

bestowing praises, and for whose notice the greatest personages

contended; whom Pope Urban VIII. honoured with a magnificent eulogium;

whom Cardinal Borghese and the Viceroy of Naples, Don Pietro de Toledo,

solicited to write, the first, the life of Pope Paul V., the second, the

wars of the Catholic king in Italy, and both in vain; whom Louis XIII.,

King of France, with the advice of Cardinal Richelieu, named his

historiographer; upon whom the Duke Carlos Emanuel, of Savoy, conferred

the same office; and in praise of whom the Duchess Christina, daughter

to his most Christian majesty, Henry IV., added in a diploma, after many

other titles, “the renown he had obtained in Italy as the first writer

of the age.”

But if Don Ferrante might be said to be well versed in all the above

sciences, there was one in which he deserved, and really obtained, the

title of professor, the science of chivalry. He not only spoke of it as

a master, but was often requested to interfere in nice points of honour,

and give his decision. He had in his library, and, we may add, in his

head also, the works of the most esteemed writers on this subject,

particularly Torquato Tasso, whom he had always ready; and he could, if

required, cite from memory all the passages of the Jerusalem Delivered,

which might be brought forward as authority in these matters. We might

speak more at large of this learned man, but we feel it to be time to

resume the thread of our history.

Nothing of importance occurred to any of the personages of our story

before the following autumn, when Agnes and Lucy expected to meet again;

but a great public event disappointed this hope. Other events followed,

which produced no material change in their destiny. Then occurred new

misfortunes, powerful and overwhelming, coming upon them like a

hurricane, which impetuously tears up and scatters every object in its

way, sweeping the land, and bearing off, with its irresistible and

mighty power, every vestige of peace and prosperity. That the particular

facts which remain to be related may not appear obscure, we must recur

for awhile to the farther recital of general facts.